18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	BF Goodrich g-force Winter /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R18	R13 - R19	R13 - R18	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

4. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 13

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

4. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 5x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

4. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 7.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 20.

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 15.8

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

4. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 2019

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. BF Goodrich g-force Winter ?

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

4. BF Goodrich g-force Winter ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
BF Goodrich g-force Winter	32	24,2
Uniroyal MS plus 77	32,8	24,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3	34,3	25,5
Continental WinterContact TS 860	31,5	24,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: -	3	2-	2	1-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3	1-	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	1-	2	2+	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
BF Goodrich g-force Winter	39,4	26,8
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: -	3,9	2,6	2,2	2,2	3,6	1,5	1,8
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	3,0	2,9	2,4	2,0	2,8	2,0	2,2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
BF Goodrich g-force Winter	42,9	28,8
Uniroyal MS plus 77	41,7	28,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3	41,9	28,9
Show test details

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands