Segment
1. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BF) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, BF winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing BF Goodrich g-force Winter and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Goodrich g-force Winter and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | BF Goodrich g-force Winter
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle2. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2 | 1- | |||
Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 39,4 | 26,8 | |||||
Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: - | 3,9 | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,2 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2,6 | 2,4 | 2,2 | 2,1 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
Show test details |