• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Nokian WR D4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BF) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, BF winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing BF Goodrich g-force Winter and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Goodrich g-force Winter and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

# BF Goodrich g-force Winter
/0%
Nokian WR D4
/0%

Add to comparison

BF
Nokian
DimensionsR14 - R18 R13 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-22+1
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
Rating: -
32-21-
Nokian WR D4
Rating: -
22-2+ 2-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34,225
BF Goodrich g-force Winter39,426,8
Nokian WR D437,326,0
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,32,11,72,02,81,51,5
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
Rating: -
3,92,62,22,23,61,5 1,8
Nokian WR D4
Rating: -
2,62,42,22,13,13,02,0
Show test details