Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 32 | 24,2 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 34,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 39,4 | 26,8 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 40,6 | 26,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: - | 3,9 | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,2 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 |
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: - | 3,7 | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2,5 | 2,1 | 3,3 | 2,4 | 3,7 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| BF Goodrich g-force Winter | 42,9 | 28,8 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 43,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
