18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	BF Goodrich g-force Winter /0%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R18	R14 - R21	R15 - R18	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

3. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

4. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 13

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

4. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 5x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 7.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

3. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 20.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

3. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 15.8

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 2019

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

4. BF Goodrich g-force Winter ?

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

4. BF Goodrich g-force Winter ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
BF Goodrich g-force Winter	32	24,2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	32,9	24,3
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	31,5	24,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: -	3	2-	2	1-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2+	2-	1-	2
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	1-	2	2+	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
BF Goodrich g-force Winter	39,4	26,8
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	36,1	25,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: -	3,9	2,6	2,2	2,2	3,6	1,5	1,8
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2,4	2,4	1,9	2,2	2,8	2,0	1,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Show test details

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands