• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

# BF Goodrich g-force Winter
/0%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
/86%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
/0%
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
/0%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
/0%

Add to comparison

BF
Dunlop
Firestone
Matador
Continental
DimensionsR14 - R18 R14 - R21 R13 - R18 R15 - R18 R13 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

4

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test29,224
BF Goodrich g-force Winter3224,2
Dunlop Winter Sport 532,924,3
Firestone Winterhawk 334,325,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow34,8-
Continental WinterContact TS 86031,524,5
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-22+1
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
Rating: -
32-21-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Rating: -
2+2-1-2
Continental WinterContact TS 860
Rating: -
1- 2 2+ 1
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34,225
BF Goodrich g-force Winter39,426,8
Dunlop Winter Sport 536,125,5
Firestone Winterhawk 339,827,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow40,626,4
Continental WinterContact TS 86034,2 25,6
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,32,11,72,02,81,51,5
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
Rating: -
3,92,62,22,23,61,5 1,8
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Rating: -
2,42,41,92,22,8 2,01,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Rating: -
3,02,92,42,0 2,8 2,02,2
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Rating: -
3,72,62,22,53,22,01,9
Show test details