18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9

Table of contents:

Summary
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	BF Goodrich g-force Winter /0%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%	Goodyear UltraGrip 9 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R18	R14 - R21	R13 - R18	R15 - R18	R14 - R21	R13 - R17	R13 - R17	R14 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

5. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium

6. BF Goodrich g-force Winter Upper-middle

7. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

8. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

7. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 41

8. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 13

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 17x

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

6. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

7. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

8. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 5x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 1.

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

7. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 7.

8. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 9.

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

5. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 20.

6. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

7. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

8. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 3.65

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

4. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

6. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 15.8

7. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

8. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 2020

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

6. BF Goodrich g-force Winter 2019

7. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

8. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

6. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

7. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

8. BF Goodrich g-force Winter ?

Worst rating in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

4. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

6. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

7. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

8. BF Goodrich g-force Winter ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
BF Goodrich g-force Winter	32	24,2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	32,9	24,3
Firestone Winterhawk 3	34,3	25,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	31,5	24,5
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	32	24,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: -	3	2-	2	1-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2+	2-	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	1-	2	2+	1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: -	2+	2	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
BF Goodrich g-force Winter	39,4	26,8
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	36,1	25,5
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Goodyear UltraGrip 9	36,1	25
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
BF Goodrich g-force Winter Rating: -	3,9	2,6	2,2	2,2	3,6	1,5	1,8
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2,4	2,4	1,9	2,2	2,8	2,0	1,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	3,0	2,9	2,4	2,0	2,8	2,0	2,2
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,5	2,1	3,3	2,4	3,7	2,0	2,1
Show test details

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands