• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9

# BF Goodrich g-force Winter
/0%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
/0%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
/0%
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
/0%
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
/0%

Add to comparison

BF
Bridgestone
Continental
Hankook
Goodyear
DimensionsR14 - R18 R14 - R21 R13 - R17 R13 - R17 R14 - R16
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

4

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-22+1
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
Rating: -
32-21-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Rating: -
23+2+ 1-
Continental WinterContact TS 860
Rating: -
1- 2 2+ 1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Rating: -
2-2 22
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
Rating: -
2+2 2+ 2-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34,225
BF Goodrich g-force Winter39,426,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00138,525,9
Continental WinterContact TS 86034,2 25,6
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W45239,126,2
Goodyear UltraGrip 936,125
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,32,11,72,02,81,51,5
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
Rating: -
3,92,62,22,23,61,5 1,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Rating: -
2,52,1 3,32,43,72,02,1
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test36,827,7
BF Goodrich g-force Winter42,928,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00143,428,1
Goodyear UltraGrip 936,928,6
Show test details