Segment
1. Barum Polaris 6 Lowcost2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Polaris 6 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Matador (40%). In this particular case, the Barum Polaris 6 has a better rating of 83% compared to 40% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 6 was done in 2025, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 87% of Barum Polaris 6 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MP93 Nordicca also have C wet ratings.
| # | Barum Polaris 6
| Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 6 Good2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 6 Good2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
