Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle4. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Polaris 5 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.213. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory3. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 37 | 27 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | 32,5 | 26 | |||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 33,9 | 26,1 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 32,8 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
