Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost4. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Polaris 5 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
| # | Barum Polaris 5
| Sava Eskimo HP2
| Debica Frigo HP2
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R15 - R18 | R15 - R18 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.153. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.474. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory3. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
