Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 67% compared to 63% of the Barum Polaris 5. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 5 was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Polaris 5 and the WR Snowproof P were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 5 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B rating. We also know where Polaris 5 is made - Czech Republic.
| # | Barum Polaris 5
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||