12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Barum Polaris 5 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	Sava Eskimo HP2 /58%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R15 - R19	R15 - R18	R13 - R19	R15 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

2. Barum Polaris 5 76

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

5. Sava Eskimo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 15x

4. Barum Polaris 5 13x

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 6.

4. Barum Polaris 5 9.

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 23.

4. Barum Polaris 5 26.

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

3. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 2025

3. Barum Polaris 5 2023

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Barum Polaris 5 Good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

69%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

62%

Barum
Polaris 5

62%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

54%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 90%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 69%

4. Barum Polaris 5 65%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet braking

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 59%

2. Barum Polaris 5 57%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 46%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 46%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet handling

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

2. Barum Polaris 5 66%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 73%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 73%

3. Barum Polaris 5 57%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 46%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. Barum Polaris 5 65%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 65%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 52%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 50%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

2. Barum Polaris 5 C

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.3%

Barum
Polaris 5

75%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

69%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

69%

Snow braking

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 83%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 81%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

4. Barum Polaris 5 76%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Snow traction

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 77%

2. Barum Polaris 5 74%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 71%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 69%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Snow handling

1. Barum Polaris 5 78%

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 71%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 63%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 57%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Snow cornering

1. Barum Polaris 5 71%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 67%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 67%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 66%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

75.4%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

70%

Barum
Polaris 5

69%

Sava
Eskimo HP2

63%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

60%

Dry braking

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 68%

2. Barum Polaris 5 63%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 57%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 55%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Dry handling

1. Barum Polaris 5 76%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 71%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 72%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 62%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

75%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

74%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

73%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

68.2%

Barum
Polaris 5

67%

Exterior noise

1. Barum Polaris 5 72%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 71%

3. Sava Eskimo HP2 69%

4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 62%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Comfort

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 90%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 81%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76%

4. Barum Polaris 5 61%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Barum Polaris 5 ?

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

79%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

78%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.1%

Barum
Polaris 5

77%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

71%

Mileage

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 80%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 79%

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 64%

4. Barum Polaris 5 65%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 86%

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 84%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 80%

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 69%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 82%

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 79%

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 74%

4. Sava Eskimo HP2 73%

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

2. Sava Eskimo HP2 C

3. Barum Polaris 5 E

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo HP2

85.2%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79.3%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3	3+	3	2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	3	3
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Barum Polaris 5	37.7	30.0
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	38.6	29.6
Sava Eskimo HP2	39.5	29.6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2.3	3.4
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2.9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Barum Polaris 5	35,6	31,0
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	37,4	30,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Barum Polaris 5	37,5	26,9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	26,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	37,6	26,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2-	2	1
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	3	2-	2	2	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	3+	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	28,6
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,5	28
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	28,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	37,4	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	2-
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2-	2	2+	3+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Barum Polaris 5	35,2	24,9
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,3	24,5
Sava Eskimo HP2	36,3	25,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	34,2	25
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Barum Polaris 5	33,9	25
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	33,5	24,3
Sava Eskimo HP2	33,6	24,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	32,8	24,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Show test details

Comparison: Barum Polaris 5 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands