Segment
2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Barum (63%). But when it comes to comparing Barum Polaris 3 4x4 and Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 3 4x4 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Polaris 3 4x4 and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 4x4 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 also have C wet ratings.
# | Barum Polaris 3 4x4
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
1. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 |
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,0 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 2,1 |
Show test details |