Segment
1. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Fulda (64%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Polaris 3 4x4 and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 4x4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 55% of Fulda Kristall Control HP2 has B rating.
| # | Barum Polaris 3 4x4
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
1. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 |
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||