Segment
1. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Lowcost2. Apollo Apterra Winter Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 4x4 vs. Apollo Apterra Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Apollo (57%). But when it comes to comparing Barum Polaris 3 4x4 and Apollo Apterra Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Polaris 3 4x4 and the Apterra Winter were tested.
| # | Barum Polaris 3 4x4
| Apollo Apterra Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Apterra Winter Satisfactory2. Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
| Barum Polaris 3 4x4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 |
| Apollo Apterra Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 2,7 |
| Show test details | |||||||
