Segment
1. Michelin e.Primacy Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended3. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM Rating: Good | 2,9 | 3,2 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
