Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Bravuris 5 HM SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Barum (30%). The first tyre test of Barum Bravuris 5 HM SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Bravuris 5 HM SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 has A rating.
| # | Barum Bravuris 5 HM SUV
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Barum Bravuris 5 HM SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Bravuris 5 HM SUV Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
