Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Pirelli Scorpion Verde Premium4. Firestone Destination HP Upper-middle5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle6. Barum Bravuris 4X4 Lowcost7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Bravuris 4X4 vs. Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Uniroyal RainExpert 3 SUV vs. Pirelli Scorpion Verde vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good6. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory7. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
4. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended5. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory6. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory7. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 0,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | ||
| Barum Bravuris 4X4 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 3,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Firestone Destination HP Rating: Good | 2,8 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Pirelli Scorpion Verde Rating: Good | 2,8 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,3 | ||
| Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 2,0 | 2,0 | 3,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
