Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Firestone Destination HP Upper-middle3. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle4. Barum Bravuris 4X4 Lowcost5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Bravuris 4X4 vs. Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
4. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory5. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory4. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory5. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 0,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | ||
| Barum Bravuris 4X4 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 3,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Firestone Destination HP Rating: Good | 2,8 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
