Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle4. Avon ZZ5 Lowcost5. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Avon ZZ5 vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Nexen N fera Sport
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
5. Avon ZZ5 18
Number of tests
Best position in test
5. Avon ZZ5 30.
Worst position in test
5. Avon ZZ5 30.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.455. Avon ZZ5 30
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended4. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended3. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended4. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Avon ZZ5 | 36,2 | 35,2 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Sport | 33,2 | 30,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
