Segment
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle2. Avon ZV7 Lowcost3. Riken Road Performance Lowcost4. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
Comparison: Avon ZV7 vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
| # | Avon ZV7
| Riken Road Performance
| Gt Radial Fe2
| Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R21 | R15 - R16 | R14 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Avon ZV7 8.3. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 22.3. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
2. Gt Radial Fe2 16.53. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good3. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good3. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 Rating: Sufficient | 4,1 | 3,9 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 37,9 | 34,3 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance | 37,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
