Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle3. Avon ZV7 Lowcost4. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Avon ZV7 vs. Nexen N fera Sport vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Toyo Celsius AS2
| # | Avon ZV7
| Nexen N fera Sport
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro
| Toyo Celsius AS2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R21 | R16 - R22 | R17 - R22 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
4. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
4. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
3. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.644. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory4. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended4. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Avon ZV7 79%
Aquaplaning - cross
4. Avon ZV7 60%
Wet handling
2. Avon ZV7 85%
Wet braking
3. Avon ZV7 74%
Wet circle cornering
2. Avon ZV7 74%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Avon ZV7 75%
Dry handling
1. Avon ZV7 88%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Avon ZV7 69%
Mileage
4. Avon ZV7 55%
Price/value
4. Avon ZV7 25%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Avon ZV7 82%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 65.1 | 28 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 63.2 | 27.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
