Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Avon ZV7 Lowcost3. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost4. Apollo Aspire XP Lowcost
| # | Avon ZV7
| Nexen N fera Sport
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro
| Apollo Aspire XP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R21 | R16 - R22 | R17 - R22 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Avon ZV7 Lowcost3. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost4. Apollo Aspire XP Lowcost
1. Avon ZV7 278
4. Avon ZV7 8.
4. Avon ZV7 42.
2. Apollo Aspire XP 8.564. Avon ZV7 18.55
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary3. Apollo Aspire XP Exemplary4. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
1. Apollo Aspire XP Good2. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended4. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
4. Avon ZV7 60%
2. Avon ZV7 79%
3. Avon ZV7 74%
2. Avon ZV7 85%
3. Avon ZV7 74%
2. Avon ZV7 69%
4. Avon ZV7 55%
4. Avon ZV7 25%
1. Avon ZV7 88%
3. Avon ZV7 75%
3. Avon ZV7 82%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 65.1 | 28 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 63.2 | 27.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||