Segment
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Austone SP901 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Austone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Austone (1%). In this particular case, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 has a better rating of 79% compared to 1% of the Austone SP901.
| # | Austone SP901
| Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Austone SP901 52.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
2. Austone SP901 27%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Austone SP901 38%
Wet circle cornering
2. Austone SP901 42%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Austone SP901 46%
Wet handling
2. Austone SP901 30%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
1. Austone SP901 96%
Snow traction
1. Austone SP901 84%
Snow braking
1. Austone SP901 88%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Austone SP901 60%
Dry handling
2. Austone SP901 33%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Austone SP901 78%
Comfort
2. Austone SP901 64%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Austone SP901 78%
