12 shops, 56 847 products

|

TheTyreLab.com
Vs
Austone Sp901
Bfgoodrich G Force Winter 2

Comparison: Austone SP901 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Austone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Austone (1%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 1% of the Austone SP901. The first tyre test of Austone SP901 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the SP901 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Austone SP901 /1%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R18	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Austone SP901 B

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Austone SP901 29

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Austone SP901 6x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Austone SP901 9.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Austone SP901 52.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Austone SP901 27

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Austone SP901 2024

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Austone SP901 ?

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Austone SP901 ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Austone
SP901

35.4%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Austone SP901 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Austone
SP901

89%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Austone
SP901

71%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Austone SP901 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Austone
SP901

46.5%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Austone
SP901

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Austone SP901 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Austone SP901	45.7	-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Show test details

ADAC

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Austone SP901 Rating: Poor	3.1	5.2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Austone SP901	37,6	30,7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	32,8
Austone SP901	41,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Show test details