Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Atlas Polarbear UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Atlas Polarbear UHP vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Atlas (0%). The first tyre test of Atlas Polarbear UHP was done in 2025, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Polarbear UHP and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested.
| # | Atlas Polarbear UHP
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | ||||||
| Atlas Polarbear UHP | 42.2 | ||||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 36.0 | 27.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
