Segment
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle4. Atlas Polarbear 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Atlas Polarbear 2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 vs. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.214. Atlas Polarbear 2 36.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Atlas Polarbear 2 | 39,6 | ||||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | 31,9 | 24,3 | |||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P | 31,8 | 25,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Atlas Polarbear 2 | 41,7 | - | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 39,1 | 25,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
