Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle5. Atlas Polarbear 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Atlas Polarbear 2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.215. Atlas Polarbear 2 36.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Atlas Polarbear 2 | 39,6 | ||||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 37,9 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | 31,9 | 24,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Atlas Polarbear 2 | 41,7 | - | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 39,1 | 25,7 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 39,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
