Segment
1. Atlas Polarbear 2 Lowcost2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Atlas) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Giti winter tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Atlas (0%). But when it comes to comparing Atlas Polarbear 2 and Giti GitiWinter W1, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Atlas Polarbear 2 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Giti GitiWinter W1 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Polarbear 2 and the Winter W1 were tested.
| # | Atlas Polarbear 2
| Giti GitiWinter W1
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Atlas Polarbear 2 Lowcost2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.562. Atlas Polarbear 2 36.5
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Atlas Polarbear 2 | 39,6 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 35,2 | 25,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||