Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium3. Atlas Polarbear 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Atlas Polarbear 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
Table of contents:
| # | Atlas Polarbear 2
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R17 | R14 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | ||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Atlas Polarbear 2 36.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| Atlas Polarbear 2 | 39,6 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P | 31,8 | 25,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
