Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium
Comparison: ARIVO Carlforful A/S vs. Vredestein Quatrac
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (ARIVO) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than ARIVO (0%). The first tyre test of ARIVO Carlforful A/S was done in 2025, compared to 2020 when was the Vredestein Quatrac first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the Carlforful A/S and the Quatrac were tested.
| # | ARIVO Carlforful A/S
| Vredestein Quatrac
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ARIVO Carlforful A/S Rating: Not recommended | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| VREDESTEIN Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
