Segment
1. Viking FourTech Plus Lowcost
Comparison: ARIVO Carlforful A/S vs. Viking FourTech Plus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Viking allround tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than ARIVO (0%). The first tyre test of ARIVO Carlforful A/S was done in 2025, compared to 2024 when was the Viking FourTech Plus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the Carlforful A/S and the FourTech Plus were tested.
| # | ARIVO Carlforful A/S
| Viking FourTech Plus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Viking FourTech Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Viking FourTech Plus Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ARIVO Carlforful A/S Rating: Not recommended | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| VIKING FourTech Plus Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 1- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
