Segment
1. Viking FourTech Plus Lowcost
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Viking allround tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than ARIVO (0%). The first tyre test of ARIVO Carlforful A/S was done in 2025, compared to 2024 when was the Viking FourTech Plus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the Carlforful A/S and the FourTech Plus were tested.
| # | ARIVO Carlforful A/S
| Viking FourTech Plus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Viking FourTech Plus Lowcost
1. Viking FourTech Plus Satisfactory
1. Viking FourTech Plus Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ARIVO Carlforful A/S Rating: Not recommended | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| VIKING FourTech Plus Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 1- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||