Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium
Comparison: ARIVO Carlforful A/S vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (ARIVO) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (82%) than ARIVO (0%). The first tyre test of ARIVO Carlforful A/S was done in 2025, compared to 2018 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the Carlforful A/S and the Kinergy 4S2 H750 were tested.
| # | ARIVO Carlforful A/S
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ARIVO Carlforful A/S Rating: Not recommended | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
