14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Apollo (57%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 49% of the Apollo Aspire XP Winter. The first tyre test of Apollo Aspire XP Winter was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Aspire XP Winter and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Apollo Aspire XP Winter /49%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R16 - R18	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 24

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 8x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 1.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 30.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 13.63

Year of the last test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 2025

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

Best rating in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 82%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 71%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 92%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

Wet circle cornering

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Wet handling

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

75%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 80%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 77%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 69%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 76%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

80%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 80%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 78%

Price/value

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

85%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Dry braking

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 77%

Dry handling

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

85%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

76%

Comfort

1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Apollo
Aspire XP Winter

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Snow
Best values in test	32.6	27.1
Apollo Aspire XP Winter	37.3	28.7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	36.0	27.3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Apollo Aspire XP Winter	37,2	33,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Good	2	2+	2	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands