Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium2. Apollo Aspire 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Aspire 4G vs. Michelin Primacy 4+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Apollo (29%). In this particular case, the Michelin Primacy 4+ has a better rating of 76% compared to 35% of the Apollo Aspire 4G. The first tyre test of Apollo Aspire 4G was done in 2017, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin Primacy 4+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Aspire 4G and the Primacy 4+ were tested.
| # | Apollo Aspire 4G
| Michelin Primacy 4+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Apollo Aspire 4G 25.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire 4G | 37,6 | 30,7 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ | 36,3 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
