Segment
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle2. Apollo Aspire 4G Lowcost3. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Aspire 4G vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.332. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.713. Apollo Aspire 4G 25.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire 4G | 37,6 | 30,7 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,9 | 33,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire 4G | 67.7 | 29.8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 65.4 | 27.7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire 4G | 35,8 | 41,4 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37 | 39,2 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
