Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle3. Apollo Aspire 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Aspire 4G vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.713. Apollo Aspire 4G 25.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire 4G | 37,6 | 30,7 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,9 | 33,0 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire 4G | 67.7 | 29.8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 65.4 | 27.7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 59 | 25.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire 4G | 35,8 | 41,4 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37 | 39,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
