Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle3. Apollo Aspire 4G Lowcost4. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Aspire 4G vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.334. Apollo Aspire 4G 25.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner3. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended3. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire 4G | 37,6 | 30,7 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire 4G | 67.7 | 29.8 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 59 | 25.3 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 67.7 | 30.9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
