Segment
1. Pirelli CARRIER Premium2. Michelin Agilis+ Premium3. Apollo Altrust Lowcost4. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Altrust vs. Pirelli CARRIER vs. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ vs. Michelin Agilis+
| # | Apollo Altrust
| Pirelli CARRIER
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+
| Michelin Agilis+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory3. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory3. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Agilis+ 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Apollo Altrust Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Pirelli CARRIER Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 1,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Michelin Agilis+ Rating: Poor | 4,9 | 2,9 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
