Segment
1. Pirelli CARRIER Premium2. Michelin Agilis+ Premium3. Falken Linam VAN01 Upper-middle4. Apollo Altrust Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Altrust vs. Pirelli CARRIER vs. Falken Linam VAN01 vs. Michelin Agilis+
| # | Apollo Altrust
| Pirelli CARRIER
| Falken Linam VAN01
| Michelin Agilis+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | R13 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Agilis+ 70 dB2. Falken Linam VAN01 72 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Apollo Altrust Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Pirelli CARRIER Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 1,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Falken Linam VAN01 Rating: Poor | 4,6 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Michelin Agilis+ Rating: Poor | 4,9 | 2,9 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
