Segment
1. Nokian cLine VAN Upper-middle2. Apollo Altrust Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Altrust vs. Nokian cLine VAN
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Apollo (29%). But when it comes to comparing Apollo Altrust and Nokian cLine VAN, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Altrust and the cLine VAN were tested.
| # | Apollo Altrust
| Nokian cLine VAN
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory2. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Altrust Satisfactory2. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Apollo Altrust Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Nokian cLine VAN Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
