Segment
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost3. Riken Road Performance Lowcost4. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G
| Riken Road Performance
| Gt Radial Fe2
| Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R16 | R14 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
2. Gt Radial Fe2 16.53. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended3. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good3. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance | 37,8 | 39,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
