Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G
| Nexen N blue HD Plus
| Toyo Proxes CF2
| Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R22 | R14 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.54. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory3. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD Plus | 35,8 | 32,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 38,6 | 32,2 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD plus | 35,7 | 31,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
