Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost4. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G
| Gt Radial Fe2
| Toyo Proxes CF2
| Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R18 | R14 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost4. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
4. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
2. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
2. Gt Radial Fe2 16.53. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.54. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended3. Gt Radial Fe2 Good4. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory4. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
4. Gt Radial Fe2 75%
4. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
2. Gt Radial Fe2 79%
1. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
2. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
2. Gt Radial Fe2 71%
4. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
2. Gt Radial Fe2 79%
1. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
2. Gt Radial Fe2 65%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||