Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Apollo (57%). In this particular case, the Michelin ALPIN 6 has a better rating of 67% compared to 65% of the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G Winter was done in 2024, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin ALPIN 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G Winter and the ALPIN 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Michelin ALPIN 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
Michelin Alpin 6 | 36.2 | 29.7 | |||||
Show test details |