Segment
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle2. Apollo Alnac 4G All Season Lowcost3. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G All Season vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Viking Fourtech
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G All Season | 42,8 | 58,5 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 43,5 | 52,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G All Season | 44,8 | 56 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 45,3 | 51 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
