Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Apollo Alnac 4G All Season Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G All Season vs. Continental AllSeasonContact
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Apollo (0%). The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G All Season was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Alnac 4G All Season and the AllSeasonContact were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G All Season
| Continental AllSeasonContact
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G All Season | 42,8 | 58,5 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 42,3 | 53 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G All Season | 44,8 | 56 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 43 | 48,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
