Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Aplus) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Aplus (0%). But when it comes to comparing Aplus A502 and Kumho WinterCraft WP51, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Aplus A502 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the A502 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested.
| # | Aplus A502
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
2. Aplus A502 46.
2. Aplus A502 46.
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Aplus A502 | 46,8 | - | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 41,0 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||