Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Antares Ingens A1 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Antares) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Antares (0%). The first tyre test of Antares Ingens A1 was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ingens A1 and the WetProof were tested.
| # | Antares Ingens A1
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Antares Ingens A1 Lowcost
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Antares Ingens A1 | 39,8 | 39,5 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof | 35,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||