Segment
1. Antares Ingens A1 Lowcost2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Antares) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Antares (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ingens A1 and the Presto HP2 were tested.
| # | Antares Ingens A1
| Debica Presto HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Antares Ingens A1 Lowcost2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
1. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Antares Ingens A1 | 39,8 | 39,5 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||